Message #2191

[D]

I agree with just about everybody's opinion so far.

I, like Izzy,understand why they do it, but I believe they could have a better balance with things. They could have the old vet ratings draws on but still do a lot with the young guys.

TBH they need to cut out some of the bullshit "acting" stuff. The reason they are better than WWE is the fantastic matches. Their skit stuff is great with Kurt Angle, Beautiful People etc but TNA get into trouble when they drop to having 20 minutes of wrestling.

I love Scottie's idea about the agreement with New Japan or other orgs over there.

Think about this: people today have ADD and can't be bothered for the most part with old school wrestling matches. Bring in those high flying luchadors like WCW did to give the show a change of pace and a shitload of excitement.

This is where WWE now fails IMO. Back in the Attitude Era, EVERYBODY had a cool angle. Even Al Snow and guys like that had SOMETHING to do. Sure it was the major angle that drew u in but it was the side dishes that make the meal so great.

Eating a big ass Steak is amazing but u need the salad,bread,beverage to go with it.

Sure the bread isn't as important as the steak but it still enhances the overall quality of the meal.. ***** I am sounding like Teddy Atlas*

X division, Cruiserweights, etc they are the side dish that make the main course that much more desirable.

Sure tag teams may not draw like a singles HW feud, but it still adds something great to the show.