thesquaredcircle

Next time, we could just have a rule that says you have to state who you are bidding for, who you're dropping as well as how much you're bidding, just so we don't have to argue any more over something like this.

Right I've cooled down, so that rule is fine, I never thought we'd have to be that detailed.

I'm not happy that after all these changes we have made that D feels fit to still rip apart the game as being inconsistent, despite me explaining the Summerslam "Restart" as mentioned, as BlowUp said, unless things are blatantly wrong, we all agreed wwe.com.  And to even mention its because your in the lead and we don't want you to win.  Its insulting when I make a point of trying to make this game as unbiased and fair as possible.  I "run" to wwe.com when it suits.

Say we sweep this under the carpet and move on, how long 'til the next time I get accused of being biased, changing the rules to suit and being inconsistent?  The points been made this game isn't perfect but we try our best, sometimes I think you forget that and think this is a walk in the park.  I know your competitive and want to win, but sometimes things just go too far.

If you wanted to point out the flaw, you could of just said when he bid that the bid was wrong/invalid, rather than posting to make it seem like it was valid, especially since you couldn't careless about the "Jobber".

I tried to restart the bidding, in the fairest way possible, yet still the complaining continued.

Well I'm not going to let this incident spoil the game for everyone else.

The bidding was restarted, and Cowbell bid $81,000 on Drew and he drops Dreamer.  If Jim wants him for $120,000 he has the shot at him again, if you really want him D then bid away.

Now hopefully this will be an END to the matter.