People who think a lot of the guys getting pushed would get it without the split are kidding themselves, heck even with the split they struggle to push a lot of the right people, until a lot of the veterans retire, or are poached by TNA there is always going to be that issue. Guys like Ziggler and Swagger have been struggling to keep their head above water on their respective brands, end the split and they are getting endeavoured....
Exactly. Could not agree more. So you would get the same names at the top without much hope of them breaking through. Imagine if Lesnar or Angle was held back because of bigger names that would have been a shame.
Some people say they were so good they would have risen to the top, but knowing the wrestling business and backstage politics you just never know.
WWE do not want to create the situations where guys who could be potential stars jump ship to TNA. So despite the better program WWE could put on by ending it they would probally consider it to create more problems than it solves.
Why not have a 3 hour RAW every month and a 3 Hour SD every month where both can appear. That way it benefits both shows and you get two supershows a month.
Bring in a ranking system in which each win gives points towards a title shot - every match then matters and it's easy for someone to be moved into the title scene or kept away
Personally i dont see the point in that at all. Its not MMA and should not want to be anything like that.
Points will just confuse thiings and will take away from decent 1on1 feuds
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register