WWE Game SPOILER Discussion Thread

[More Cowbell]

Here's my thinking "we only do wrestling matches not boxing matches diva bikini ofs or maste lock challenges" "for you to get points a bell must ring to start the match and get points.


Thats why we didnt take away points when Drew was stripped in a no match. no bell no match no points.  lets say he was stripped of the title bac and then a match later on that night and won the title back he wouldnt loose any points but would get the win a title points as he won the title in a match.


wwe writes there or history book. Hell they wont even mention benit a act like he never existed. we dont go off wwe for results.


it was a title match. the bell rang and he won via pinfa. match over.
vince can write whatever letter at that point the match is over nd there is no points to win or loose.

lets say brt wins the title tonight in a title match and right after gets stripbret would still be awarded points.


we go from bell to bell if drew stopped in the middle of the match and  champion then the match becomes non title. when the final bell rang he won  a title in the match.


this game alone is rewriting the game books.

[Hammy]

Fine, I've switched it to 42, anything for a peaceful life. 

[D]

all bias aside, i def think he getting the pts is fair and what should happen. im trying to think if something like this has happened before...... but nothing is coming to mind.

[EricxGNRxSTARx]

If this is true, I think we need to re-distribute some points! After all, I lost a belt in the last game by like 5 points!

As per the Smackdown spoilers tonight in Ottawa, Ontario.
* Layla and Michelle McCool (announced as the co-Women's champions) defeated Tiffany and Kelly Kelly.

[D]

Co Women's champs?? and people so TNA is dumb

[D]

Here's my thinking "we only do wrestling matches not boxing matches diva bikini ofs or maste lock challenges" "for you to get points a bell must ring to start the match and get points.


Thats why we didnt take away points when Drew was stripped in a no match. no bell no match no points.  lets say he was stripped of the title bac and then a match later on that night and won the title back he wouldnt loose any points but would get the win a title points as he won the title in a match.


wwe writes there or history book. Hell they wont even mention benit a act like he never existed. we dont go off wwe for results.


it was a title match. the bell rang and he won via pinfa. match over.
vince can write whatever letter at that point the match is over nd there is no points to win or loose.

lets say brt wins the title tonight in a title match and right after gets stripbret would still be awarded points.


we go from bell to bell if drew stopped in the middle of the match and  champion then the match becomes non title. when the final bell rang he won  a title in the match.


this game alone is rewriting the game books.

Plus like i said last game.. i don't care as long as its consistent.

the rule has always been what our eyes  see, what is announced etc which is why we have never went by WWE.com for match results so i don't think we can go by championship history now for this.

[Gnrfan]

If this is true, I think we need to re-distribute some points! After all, I lost a belt in the last game by like 5 points!

As per the Smackdown spoilers tonight in Ottawa, Ontario.
* Layla and Michelle McCool (announced as the co-Women's champions) defeated Tiffany and Kelly Kelly.

The difference is only one of them won it! Layla pinned Beth and got the win. If they are announced as Co-Womens Champions and defend it as such then that makes it interesting.

But McCool gets nothing for that match on SD.

[Evolution]

I'm still not on board these Kingston points. It's a reversed decision.

[Hammy]

I'm still not on board these Kingston points. It's a reversed decision.

Well neither I am, but its arguable, both ways and like I said, anything for a peaceful life.

[D]

I really wouldn't have complained either way

i think next game we really need to write something concrete into the rules

cause going by criteria set.we dont use wwe.com

match is announced, bell rings, person is announced as new champ

only thing i can see is, when someone wins a match then the gm or vince comes down and restarts the match... so can this technically be looked at this way??

 I say we write into the rules, the champion gets retain pts ONLY if the show ends and he is still champ

cause in all honesty, its sort of the same thing when they do the MITB **** after a guy wins a title.

[D]

I got a great shot at MITB to get back in this.

If Harts defend belts against Osos  that would be 40 *not sure if its booked but it should get booked*
Layla defends against Kelly that is 40
I have Drew,Matt and John Morrison in MITB  John gives me 13

Drew or Matt have a great chance at winning. if one does, I will have roughly 30pts and then 13 from the other and id have roughly 130 some pts

Cowbell would get 13 for miz, 13 for cody 13 for kofi 

id gain almost 100pts

[More Cowbell]

Yeah right between Kofi, Miz, and Dashing I got atleast 1 if not 2 winners of MITB matches, Use all the math you want but Hardy is only going to win the right to give Miz a mouth party.

Also what makes you think your woman is gaurenteed to retain? They made alicia fox a champion anything can happen.

[D]

Def worried about Layla for sure, but she just got the belt and her and Michelle are over and I figure her and Michelle will split and thats when she will lose the title back to Michelle.

Hell harts could lose tag belts to Oslos also.


If all our guys lose MITB and both my champs defend.. ill gain 80pts.. i am currently down 74.

gonna be one hell of a SS if that happens.

[Hammy]

After RAW, safe to say Harts will retain and Layla should, she is on a role, Kelly Kelly is the pits, she is a prime example of, look we have spread our roster too thin, she'll do for now.

[Gnrfan]

I just think the MITB mathes are wide open.

I think Drew wins the SD one but i thought that at Mania too and no one saw Swagger coming.

The Raw one is the hardest to call beacuse despite the big stars (Jericho, Edge & Orton) in that match i'd like to think that someone else gets it and if i'm honest no one needs it more than Morrison.... you'd have to think Bourne is there for a Wow moment... Henry wasn't even in it til Truth went out.... and then there is Ted Dibiase, who gets better and better for me.

Tough one but i think the MITB matches are gonna shine big for D