2009 has featured a lot of title changes in World Wrestling Entertainment. The World Title has changed hands 8-times, while the WWE Title has changed hands 7-times
To the IWC this is bad. Most die hard fans want long, meaningful reigns, people think short reigns de-value the belts, but is it really a minor issue, if the product is good the product is good right? I think like this because as annoying as some quick title switches are, look at the Attitude Era people view in such a positive light as the greatest era in wrestling history (well it is to many), there were so many switches it was untrue yet we didn't complain then did we? Or was that because we weren't smarks then?
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register