Sheamus vs Triple H?
Really cant see the point
I agree about HHH vs Sheamus..... It would feel rushed now unless D-X lose the tag titles pretty quickly.
Wrestlemania isnt about young stars its about the biggest stars, dragging out the big guns
Sheamus is already the champion so gains little from beating Triple H and Triple H would only undue all the work they have put into Sheamus by getting the win....
...and lets face it, no one cares about Sheamus, not even WWE, its just a gimmick because even they are bored of Cena
But they can be young and big! I like the idea of one title match with only big stars and one with at least one younger guy. I think WWE do care about Sheamus or they wouldn't of given him the title and put him over against Cena.
Sheamus would gain by beating HHH, especially at Wrestlemania! In fact i think by doing that it would put him a rung higher in the WWE internal standings. Just like when Cena made HHH & HBK tap.... everyone was like Wow! never thought i'd see that.
As for HBK v Undertaker - absurd! Taker will of course win so repeating last years match, how unoriginal is that? I think it will be Taker and Bret v HBK and Vince (which is actually worse...)
If i was them i wouldn't want to do it! It will be hard to beat their last match and Undertaker won't lose to HBK IMO.
I also don't like Taker's matches being for the title as his streak alone gives the match substance.
Edge vs Jericho..... Book It!
Home
Search
Calendar
Login
Register