I thought the consensus was that we went with wwe.com unless it was cleary wrong (eg. saying a match was for a title even though the title was never mentioned on TV)?
At SS, it was announced that the match was to be "restarted", ie. the decision made by the referee was overruled and the match would continue.
However, I agree with D on the point about Jim's bid not counting since he didn't know who/what he was bidding on.
Next time, we could just have a rule that says you
have to state who you are bidding
for, who you're
dropping as well as how much you're bidding, just so we don't have to argue any more over something like this.
